Why did Burwell v Hobby Lobby go to the Supreme Court?

Why did Burwell v Hobby Lobby go to the Supreme Court?

In the 2014 case Burwell v. Hobby Lobby, the US Supreme Court ruled that the contraceptive mandate promulgated under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act violated privately held, for-profit corporations’ right to religious freedom.

What does the Religious Freedom Restoration Act do?

Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 – Prohibits any agency, department, or official of the United States or any State (the government) from substantially burdening a person’s exercise of religion even if the burden results from a rule of general applicability, except that the government may burden a person’s …

Does the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 allow a for-profit company to deny its employees health coverage of contraception to which the employees would otherwise be entitled based on the religious objections of the company’s owners?

Does the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 allow a for-profit company to deny its employees health coverage of contraception to which the employees would otherwise be entitled based on the religious objections of the company’s owners? Yes.

What are Religious Freedom Restoration laws?

Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), (1993), U.S. legislation that originally prohibited the federal government and the states from “substantially burden[ing] a person’s exercise of religion” unless “application of the burden…is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest” and “is the least restrictive …

Is the religious freedom Restoration Act ( RFRA ) responsible for Hobby Lobby?

The federal RFRA law is directly responsible for the Supreme Court’s Hobby Lobby debacle. State RFRAs, based on the federal version, are emboldening corporations and business owners to discriminate against gay people, religious minorities and the nonreligious, and any other group their religion declares inferior.

Why was the religious freedom Restoration Act passed?

Religious hysteria exploded after the Smith decision, so Congress passed RFRA: a super-statute that effectively amends every other federal law. RFRA essentially acts as a de facto constitutional amendment. In 1997, the Supreme Court ruled the federal RFRA unconstitutional as applied to the states, but allowed it to continue to apply to federal law.

What was the significance of the Hobby Lobby case?

But Hobby Lobby is also unprecedented in another, equally important way. For the first time, the court has interpreted a federal statute, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (or RFRA), as affording more protection for religion than has ever been provided under the First Amendment.

What was the decision in Hobby Lobby vs Burwell?

Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. It is the first time that the court has recognized a for-profit corporation’s claim of religious belief, but it is limited to closely held corporations. The decision does not address whether such corporations are protected by the free-exercise of religion clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution.

About the Author

You may also like these